Och här har vi då en Oilersbloggares syn på saken.
"To me, this doesn’t even seem particularly difficult - I’m having a hard time seeing the arguments in the Oilers favour here. The only way in which the Oilers can sign Nylander to a contract is by filing that contract with the Central Registry and the contract being approved by the league. The only document that can be filed with Central Registry is an SPC. An SPC with an email or something else attached indicating agreement would seem to me to be a modified document. I would argue that the provision in 11.5(a) respecting the optically-scanned signatures being affixed thereon provides some support to this position as well - if the SPC can’t be modified and the optically-scanned signatures have to be visible - how can whatever the Oilers have meet that test, unless what they have is a signed SPC?"
Rip Kirby: Målrikt. 3-2 till Buffalo redan efter 11 minuter. 11-8 i skott på mål. Matchen är ju ännu helt jämn men känns som att Montreals chans ligger i att få ordning på den normalt sett starka defensiven. Den här typen av match vinner de inte annars.
"To me, this doesn’t even seem particularly difficult - I’m having a hard time seeing the arguments in the Oilers favour here. The only way in which the Oilers can sign Nylander to a contract is by filing that contract with the Central Registry and the contract being approved by the league. The only document that can be filed with Central Registry is an SPC. An SPC with an email or something else attached indicating agreement would seem to me to be a modified document. I would argue that the provision in 11.5(a) respecting the optically-scanned signatures being affixed thereon provides some support to this position as well - if the SPC can’t be modified and the optically-scanned signatures have to be visible - how can whatever the Oilers have meet that test, unless what they have is a signed SPC?"